Best Researcher Award
Abd El-Fattah Omran
Electronics Research Institute, Egypt
Abd El-Fattah Omran is a researcher affiliated with the Electronics Research Institute in Egypt. His research profile, as represented by the supplied bibliometric information, records six documents, 121 citations, and an h-index of 3. The profile identifies electrical engineering as his subject area and presents his research achievements in the context of the Best Researcher Award associated with the International Research Excellence And Citation Awards. Bibliometric indicators offer a quantitative perspective on scholarly output and citation activity, but they should be considered alongside research quality, originality, relevance, and broader academic contributions. \(1\)
1. Abstract
This article presents an academic recognition profile for Abd El-Fattah Omran, affiliated with the Electronics Research Institute in Egypt. The supplied bibliometric record reports six research documents, 121 citations, and an h-index of 3 in the electrical engineering subject area. These indicators provide an overview of the documented publication and citation record. The profile is associated with the Best Researcher Award at the International Research Excellence And Citation Awards. A comprehensive assessment of research merit would also consider the content and originality of publications, methodological rigor, practical applications, collaborations, and contributions to the research community. \(1\)
2. Keywords
Abd El-Fattah Omran; Best Researcher Award; electrical engineering; Electronics Research Institute; scholarly publications; citation analysis; research evaluation; bibliometrics; Egypt; academic recognition.
3. Introduction
Research recognition programs provide a platform for acknowledging scholarly work and its potential contribution to scientific and technological progress. In engineering disciplines, research may support the development, evaluation, and improvement of electronic systems, electrical technologies, and related applications. The significance of individual research should be examined through verifiable publications, research methods, originality, and evidence of academic or practical impact.
Abd El-Fattah Omran’s supplied profile identifies the Electronics Research Institute in Egypt as his institutional affiliation. The available metrics offer a concise starting point for documenting his research record. They do not, on their own, establish the precise focus of his publications or demonstrate specific technical achievements; such conclusions require examination of the underlying publications and authoritative researcher records. \(1\)
4. Research Profile
The supplied researcher information associates Abd El-Fattah Omran with the Electronics Research Institute and identifies Egypt as his country. His stated subject area is electrical engineering. The Scopus author identifier supplied for this profile is 58032007700, which can be used to locate the corresponding author record and review its indexed bibliographic information. \(1\)
The reported metrics are summarized below. Citation counts and author-level indicators may change as databases add records, update citation links, or correct indexed information. They should therefore be interpreted in relation to the date of retrieval and the coverage of the relevant database.
5. Research Contributions
The available profile identifies electrical engineering as the researcher’s subject area but does not provide a verified list of individual research findings, technical developments, patents, or specific projects. Consequently, particular inventions or scientific contributions cannot be attributed to him from the bibliometric figures alone.
A detailed evaluation of research contributions could examine the following evidence, where available:
- Original research findings and clearly documented technical advances in electrical engineering.
- Methodological quality, reproducibility, and appropriate validation of published results.
- Evidence of application in engineering systems, technology development, or industry-related research.
- Research collaboration, contributions to scientific publications, and participation in academic projects.
- Evidence of influence on subsequent research, supported by relevant publications and independently verifiable citations.
These criteria provide a framework for describing research activity without assuming achievements that have not been established through primary sources.
6. Publications
The supplied bibliometric information reports six documents associated with the researcher. Individual publication titles, author lists, journal or conference names, publication dates, and digital object identifiers (DOIs) were not provided in the input data. They are therefore not listed here as verified bibliographic entries.
For a complete publication record, the Scopus author profile should be consulted and its entries checked against publisher pages or other authoritative bibliographic records. Where a publication has a DOI, the DOI should be included as a persistent identifier and linked to its registered destination. \(1\)
A verified publication list can document research topics, co-authorship, publication venues, and the development of a research program over time. It also provides the necessary evidence for distinguishing original research articles from reviews, conference papers, and other indexed document types.
7. Research Impact
The supplied total of 121 citations indicates that the researcher’s indexed publications have received citations in the relevant bibliographic record. The h-index of 3 provides a separate measure of publication output and citation distribution. These indicators describe different aspects of scholarly activity and should not be treated as complete measures of research quality or societal benefit. \(1\)
A fuller impact assessment would examine the context of citations, the relevance of citing work, the contribution of individual publications, and evidence of use beyond academic literature. Depending on the research area, additional evidence may include technical adoption, collaboration with industry, contributions to research infrastructure, and documented benefits to professional practice.
Bibliometric comparisons should account for publication year, disciplinary citation practices, database coverage, and differences between research fields. Citation counts can help describe scholarly visibility, but they should be interpreted alongside qualitative expert assessment.
8. Award Suitability
The Best Researcher Award profile is associated with the International Research Excellence And Citation Awards. The supplied publication and citation indicators provide quantitative information that may form part of a research recognition assessment. However, the metrics alone do not confirm award selection, independently verified research achievements, or the outcome of any formal judging process.
A balanced award assessment should consider documented research originality, quality and relevance of publications, the candidate’s individual contributions, evidence of impact, research integrity, and the consistency of the record with the award’s published criteria. Where applicable, external validation and independent expert review can strengthen the assessment.
The award profile should be understood as an academic recognition summary based on the information supplied. Any statement that the researcher is an official recipient should be supported by an authoritative announcement or award record from the organizer.
9. Conclusion
Abd El-Fattah Omran’s supplied research profile identifies an affiliation with the Electronics Research Institute in Egypt and a subject area in electrical engineering. The reported record includes six documents, 121 citations, and an h-index of 3. These indicators offer a concise bibliometric overview and provide a starting point for further examination of his scholarly work.
A comprehensive account of research contributions and award suitability requires verified publication records, evidence of individual achievements, and clear documentation of the award outcome. Consulting authoritative researcher and publisher records can improve the accuracy and completeness of this academic recognition profile.
10. External Links
References
- Elsevier. (n.d.). Scopus author details:
https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=58032007700
- International Research Excellence And Citation Awards. (n.d.). Award website.
https://citationawards.com/
- ORCID. (n.d.). ORCID researcher identifier.
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6705-5602