Mohammadali Arjomand| Academic Excellence Citation Award | Geotechnics

Published on by Citation Awards

Academic Excellence Citation Award

Mohammadali Arjomand ·
Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University ·

Mohammadali Arjomand
Affiliation Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University
Country Iran
Scholar  ID ee84b0kAAAAJ&hl
Documents 57
Citations 1,298
h-index 18
Subject Area Geotechnics
Event International Research Excellence And Citation Awards

Mohammadali Arjomand is a researcher affiliated with Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University in Iran, whose stated subject area is geotechnics. The available academic profile reports 57 documents, 1,298 citations, and an h-index of 18. These bibliometric indicators provide a quantitative snapshot of the research output and citation activity associated with the supplied profile. The Best Researcher Award article presents these details in the context of academic recognition and research impact, with an emphasis on transparent reporting and the importance of evaluating scholarly contributions alongside their disciplinary context.

Abstract

This academic recognition profile summarizes the supplied bibliometric information for Mohammadali Arjomand, affiliated with Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University, Iran, and working in the subject area of geotechnics. The reported profile contains 57 documents, 1,298 citations, and an h-index of 18. These measures are commonly used to describe aspects of scholarly productivity and citation visibility, although their interpretation depends on database coverage, publication type, field-specific citation practices, and the date on which the records were retrieved. The profile is presented in connection with the International Research Excellence And Citation Awards and the Best Researcher Award category. Detailed publication titles, individual research findings, and independently verified award decisions were not supplied and are therefore not asserted here.

Keywords

Mohammadali Arjomand; geotechnics; geotechnical engineering; research impact; scholarly publications; citation analysis; h-index; academic recognition; Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University; Best Researcher Award; International Research Excellence And Citation Awards.

Introduction

Research recognition provides an opportunity to document scholarly activity, communicate research contributions, and acknowledge work that may contribute to the development of a discipline. In geotechnics, scholarly research broadly concerns the engineering behaviour of soil and rock, subsurface conditions, and the analysis and design of ground-related infrastructure. The scope of any individual researcher’s work, however, must be established from verified publications and research records rather than inferred solely from a subject classification.

This article records the researcher details and citation indicators supplied for Mohammadali Arjomand. The Google Scholar author profile is included as an external source for further examination of the listed scholarly record. Bibliometric figures can change over time and may differ across academic databases because of variations in indexing, author attribution, and citation counting. They should therefore be interpreted as a dated snapshot rather than a complete assessment of research quality.[1][2]

Research Profile

The supplied profile identifies Mohammadali Arjomand as affiliated with Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University in Iran, with geotechnics listed as the principal subject area. The reported publication and citation measures are summarized below. These values are reproduced from the supplied information and have not been independently verified against a live bibliographic database.

The h-index combines publication output and citation counts by identifying the number of publications that have each received at least that number of citations. An h-index of 18 therefore indicates that at least 18 works meet the threshold of 18 citations each, if the supplied metric is calculated according to the conventional definition and the underlying profile is correctly attributed. The measure does not, by itself, capture the quality, originality, or practical significance of individual studies.[2]

Research Contributions

Geotechnics is an interdisciplinary engineering field concerned with the interaction between engineered structures and the ground. Research within this area may involve soil mechanics, foundation engineering, slope stability, ground improvement, geotechnical site investigation, and the analysis of soil–structure interactions. These are general themes within the discipline and should not be interpreted as a verified list of Mohammadali Arjomand’s specific research projects.

A rigorous account of an individual researcher’s contributions should be based on identifiable publications, documented methods, research findings, and evidence of subsequent use or discussion by other scholars. The supplied bibliometric summary establishes reported publication and citation totals but does not include paper titles, abstracts, project records, or descriptions of particular findings. Accordingly, this profile does not attribute specific technical discoveries or applications to the researcher without supporting documentation.

For a fuller research contribution statement, the following evidence would be useful:

  • Verified publication records with titles, abstracts, publication venues, and persistent identifiers.
  • Descriptions of research questions, methods, findings, and their relevance to geotechnical engineering.
  • Evidence of practical applications, collaborations, research projects, or documented influence on subsequent work, where available.
  • Independent indicators of scholarly use, interpreted in the context of the relevant subfield and publication dates.

Publications

The supplied profile reports 57 documents. A complete publication bibliography cannot be reconstructed reliably from this aggregate count alone. Publication titles, author order, years, journal or conference details, and DOI information should be taken directly from verified bibliographic records. The Google Scholar author profile linked below provides a starting point for locating the researcher’s listed works and citation information.

A publication list intended for formal academic recognition should be checked for duplicate records, spelling variations in author names, and correct attribution of citations. DOI links should be included only when a valid identifier has been established for a specific publication. No individual DOI is added here because the supplied information does not identify a particular paper.

Research Impact

The supplied metrics report 1,298 citations across 57 documents, alongside an h-index of 18. Together, these figures offer a quantitative summary of the research profile as reported by the user. Citation counts can indicate that scholarly works have been referenced by later publications, but they do not independently establish methodological reliability, research originality, societal benefit, or the direction of a study’s influence. Citation practices also vary across disciplines and publication types.[2][3]

Responsible research assessment therefore benefits from combining quantitative indicators with qualitative examination of research content, methods, transparency, reproducibility, and relevance. The Leiden Manifesto recommends that quantitative evaluation support expert assessment rather than replace it, and that indicators be interpreted in relation to the purposes and context of an evaluation.[3]

For this profile, the figures should be treated as reported values rather than independently confirmed current totals. A formal evaluation should record the source database and retrieval date and verify that the publications and citations are attributable to the correct author profile.

Award Suitability

The Best Researcher Award is the recognition category specified for this article in connection with the International Research Excellence And Citation Awards. The available information documents an institutional affiliation, a subject area, and three reported bibliometric indicators. These details can inform an initial research profile, but they do not establish that an award has been formally granted or that the researcher has met any particular judging criteria.

A balanced assessment for a researcher recognition category may consider multiple forms of evidence, including:

  • Verified scholarly publications and the significance of their research questions and findings.
  • Citation evidence considered in relation to publication age, discipline, and database coverage.
  • Originality, methodological rigour, research integrity, and reproducibility where relevant.
  • Documented contributions to the research community, collaboration, or practical applications, where supported by evidence.
  • Compliance with the award programme’s published eligibility rules and evaluation procedures.

The figures listed in this article may serve as supporting profile information, but a determination of award eligibility or selection requires the applicable official criteria and the relevant supporting documentation. Event details and programme information can be consulted through the Citation Awards website.

Conclusion

This article presents a structured academic recognition profile for Mohammadali Arjomand of Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University, Iran, in the subject area of geotechnics. Based on the information supplied, the profile reports 57 documents, 1,298 citations, and an h-index of 18. These measures provide a useful starting point for describing scholarly output and citation activity, but should be interpreted alongside verified publications and qualitative evidence of research contributions.

Further development of this profile would benefit from a verified publication bibliography, confirmed author identifiers, and documentation of specific research findings and applications. The article does not independently verify the reported metrics or assert a final award outcome. Maintaining these distinctions supports accurate, transparent, and responsible academic recognition.

References

  1. Google Scholar. (n.d.). Author profile: Mohammadali Arjomand. Google Scholar. The profile is linked using the author identifier supplied for this article; its identity and current bibliometric totals should be checked before formal publication.
    https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=ee84b0kAAAAJ&hl=en&oi=sra
  2. Citation Awards. (n.d.). Official website. The website is provided as the official event-related destination supplied for this article. Specific award rules and decisions should be checked against current official programme information.
    https://citationawards.com/

Rahim Zahedi |Best Researcher Award|Environment

Published on by Citation Awards

Best Researcher Award

Rahim Zahedi ·
University of Tehran

Rahim Zahedi
Affiliation University of Tehran
Country Iran
Google Scholar ID uMoggwwAAAAJ
Documents 100
Citations 5,455
h-index 38
Subject Area Environment
Event International Research Excellence And Citation Awards
ORCID 0000-0001-6837-8729
Award website Citation Awards

Rahim Zahedi is a researcher affiliated with the University of Tehran in Iran, associated with the subject area of environmental research. The supplied bibliometric profile reports 100 documents, 5,455 citations, and an h-index of 38. These indicators provide quantitative context for examining publication output and citation visibility, although they do not independently establish research quality or societal impact. The Best Researcher Award presented in the context of the International Research Excellence And Citation Awards provides a framework for recognizing scholarly contributions and research engagement. Bibliographic information and citation metrics should be verified against the researcher’s linked profiles and the relevant data retrieval date before formal publication. [1] [2]

Abstract

This article presents a research recognition profile for Rahim Zahedi, affiliated with the University of Tehran, Iran, and associated with environmental research. According to the bibliometric figures supplied for this profile, the researcher has 100 documents, 5,455 citations, and an h-index of 38. These measures offer an overview of reported scholarly productivity and citation reach. The profile places this information in the context of the Best Researcher Award and the International Research Excellence And Citation Awards. Because individual publications, research findings, and independently verified award outcomes were not supplied, this article does not attribute specific discoveries or confirmed award decisions to the researcher. [1] [2]

Keywords

Rahim Zahedi; Best Researcher Award; environmental research; University of Tehran; research assessment; bibliometrics; citation analysis; scholarly productivity; h-index; research recognition; International Research Excellence And Citation Awards.

Introduction

Academic recognition provides a means of highlighting research activity, scholarly communication, and contributions to the advancement of knowledge. Researchers working in environmental fields may contribute to understanding environmental processes, evaluating sustainability challenges, and informing evidence-based responses to environmental problems. The precise scope of an individual’s contributions, however, must be established through verified publications and research records rather than inferred from a broad subject classification alone.

Rahim Zahedi’s supplied profile identifies the University of Tehran as the institutional affiliation and Iran as the country. The reported citation metrics provide a starting point for describing the profile quantitatively. A complete academic assessment would also consider research methods, originality, publication quality, reproducibility, collaboration, and relevance to environmental science. [2] [3]

Research Profile

The supplied researcher information associates Rahim Zahedi with the University of Tehran and the subject area of environment. The profile includes a Google Scholar identifier and an ORCID identifier, which can be used as starting points for checking the researcher’s publications and author metadata. Author identifiers are useful for distinguishing researchers with similar names and for connecting scholarly records across research information systems. Their existence alone does not guarantee that every linked record is complete or correctly attributed. [1] [4]

The reported indicators are summarized below. They reflect the supplied figures and should not be interpreted as a live or independently audited bibliometric extract.

Bibliometric values can differ between databases because of differences in coverage, document types, author disambiguation, and update schedules. A rigorous profile should specify the database and retrieval date used for each metric. [2] [3]

Research Contributions

Environmental research encompasses the study of environmental systems, human interactions with natural resources, pollution, ecological change, and sustainability. Research contributions in this field can include original empirical studies, analytical methods, data resources, interdisciplinary collaboration, and evidence that informs environmental management or policy. These are general examples of contribution types rather than verified descriptions of Rahim Zahedi’s individual research.

To document specific contributions accurately, the profile should be supplemented with verified publications, abstracts, project records, and evidence of the findings or methods associated with each work. Research claims should be connected to primary sources wherever possible, with conclusions described in proportion to the evidence presented. [3]

A detailed evaluation of research contributions may consider the following dimensions:

  • Originality and significance of research questions.
  • Methodological rigor, transparent reporting, and reproducibility.
  • Contribution to environmental knowledge and interdisciplinary understanding.
  • Evidence of practical, scientific, or policy relevance.
  • Responsible research practices and appropriate acknowledgment of collaborators.

Publications

The supplied profile reports 100 documents. A publication-level bibliography was not included in the source information provided for this article. Consequently, individual article titles, publication years, journal names, author order, and digital object identifiers cannot be listed reliably here without checking the relevant scholarly records.

The researcher’s Google Scholar profile is a starting point for locating indexed scholarly works. The linked ORCID record can also be consulted for researcher-supplied publication metadata. Records should be cross-checked against publisher pages and DOI registration information before being cited in a final bibliography. [4] [5]

For a fully documented publication section, each entry should include the verified author list, article title, journal or book title, publication year, volume and issue where applicable, page range or article number, and DOI where available. No individual DOI is asserted in this profile because no specific publication or DOI was supplied for verification.

Research Impact

The reported total of 5,455 citations and h-index of 38 offers a quantitative indication of the visibility of the researcher’s scholarly output within the source represented by the supplied metrics. The h-index is defined as the largest value h for which at least h publications have each received at least h citations. It combines publication volume with citation frequency but does not directly measure the originality, rigor, or practical value of research. [2]

Citation counts can be influenced by field-specific citation practices, the age of publications, co-authorship patterns, database coverage, and the inclusion of different document types. Citation indicators are therefore best interpreted alongside qualitative assessment, publication-level evidence, research integrity, and documented scholarly or societal outcomes. [3]

A balanced assessment of research impact may consider:

  • Citation patterns across publications and relevant subject areas.
  • Influence on subsequent research, as demonstrated by verifiable citing works.
  • Research reproducibility, data transparency, and methodological contribution.
  • Evidence of practical applications, environmental outcomes, or policy engagement, when documented.
  • Collaboration, responsible scholarship, and contributions to the wider research community.

Award Suitability

The Best Researcher Award is a recognition category relevant to evaluating scholarly output, research contributions, and professional impact. Rahim Zahedi’s supplied profile includes a substantial reported publication and citation record that may be considered as part of a research recognition assessment. Bibliometric indicators alone, however, cannot establish eligibility, merit, or the outcome of an award decision.

Within the International Research Excellence And Citation Awards framework, a transparent assessment of a nominee may consider evidence in the following areas, subject to the published rules and criteria of the specific award edition:

  1. Verified scholarly publications and the originality of the research.
  2. Research quality, methodological soundness, and reproducibility.
  3. Citation performance interpreted in the context of the relevant discipline.
  4. Documented contributions to environmental research and scientific understanding.
  5. Research ethics, collaborative contributions, and evidence of broader impact.

The event name and award category identify the recognition context for this article; they do not independently confirm that an award has been conferred. Any statement of nomination, selection, or receipt should be supported by an official award announcement or other verifiable record. Further information about the awards is available on the official Citation Awards website.

Conclusion

This academic recognition profile summarizes the information supplied for Rahim Zahedi of the University of Tehran, Iran. The reported figures of 100 documents, 5,455 citations, and an h-index of 38 provide a quantitative snapshot of scholarly activity associated with the environmental research subject area. These metrics should be interpreted with attention to database coverage, retrieval date, and the limitations of citation-based evaluation. A more comprehensive account of the researcher’s work would require a verified publication list, specific research findings, and independent supporting evidence. The Best Researcher Award and the International Research Excellence And Citation Awards provide the recognition context for this profile, while any formal award outcome should be confirmed through official documentation.

References

The following sources provide researcher-profile access points and methodological context for interpreting bibliometric indicators. The numerical values in this article are based on the supplied profile data and have not been independently verified against a live database.

    1. Google Scholar. (n.d.). Rahim Zahedi: Author profile and scholarly publications. Google Scholar. Profile identifier supplied for this article; author identity and profile metrics should be verified directly.
      https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=uMoggwwAAAAJ
  1. ORCID. (n.d.). ORCID researcher identifier and record. ORCID. The supplied identifier is provided as a researcher-record lookup; record ownership and contents should be checked directly.
    https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6837-8729
  2. Crossref. (n.d.). Crossref metadata search. Crossref. This resource can be used to check registered publication metadata and DOI records when individual publication details are available.
    https://search.crossref.org/
  3. International Research Excellence And Citation Awards. (n.d.). Citation Awards official website. Official event and award information. Specific edition rules and award outcomes should be confirmed using the relevant official announcement.
    https://citationawards.com/

Maria-Isabel Roldos |Research Excellence Award|Health Policy

Published on by Citation Awards

Research Excellence Award

Maria-Isabel Roldos ·
City University of New York · Health Policy

Maria-Isabel Roldos 
Affiliation City University of New York
Country United States
Scopus ID 55847472600
Documents 20
Citations 77
h-index 6
Subject Area Health Policy
Event International Research Excellence And Citation Awards

Maria-Isabel Roldos ·contributions, research quality, and the potential of academic work to advance knowledge and inform professional practice. This profile presents Maria-Isabel Roldos, affiliated with the City University of New York in the United States, in the subject area of health policy. The supplied bibliometric information records 20 documents, 77 citations, and an h-index of 6. These indicators provide a quantitative overview of indexed research output and citation activity, while the broader significance of scholarly work also depends on its methods, originality, relevance, and influence on policy and practice. [1]

Abstract

This academic recognition profile summarizes the supplied research information for Maria-Isabel Roldos, whose identified subject area is health policy. The profile records an affiliation with the City University of New York and reports 20 indexed documents, 77 citations, and an h-index of 6, attributed to the supplied Scopus author identifier. These indicators can help describe publication activity and citation visibility, but they do not independently establish the quality, policy relevance, or societal impact of individual studies. A comprehensive evaluation of research excellence should also consider methodological rigor, originality, transparency, responsible research practices, and contributions to health systems and population well-being. [1] [2]

Keywords

Research Excellence Award; Maria-Isabel Roldos; health policy; health policy research; public health; academic recognition; bibliometrics; scholarly publications; citation analysis; research impact; City University of New York; research assessment.

Introduction

Health policy research examines how policies, institutions, resources, and governance arrangements influence health services and population outcomes. It can inform decisions concerning access to care, health equity, service delivery, financing, and the organization of health systems. Research in this field often draws on interdisciplinary methods, including epidemiology, economics, public administration, sociology, and health services research.

The Research Excellence Award provides a framework for recognizing scholarly work and its potential contribution to academic knowledge and professional practice. In documenting an individual research profile, it is important to distinguish verified bibliographic information from interpretations of research quality. The bibliometric figures presented here are the values supplied for this profile and should be checked against the live author record when used for formal evaluation. [1]

Research Profile

Maria-Isabel Roldos is presented in this profile as a researcher affiliated with the City University of New York, United States, with health policy identified as the relevant subject area. The supplied Scopus author identifier provides a route to the corresponding indexed author record, where publication metadata and citation information can be reviewed. [1]

The information provided for this article does not include a verified ORCID identifier, a complete publication bibliography, or detailed descriptions of individual research projects. Accordingly, this profile does not attribute specific findings, funded projects, editorial responsibilities, or policy outcomes to the researcher without supporting evidence. These details may be added when reliable source material is available.

The reported bibliometric indicators are summarized below.

Bibliometric values can vary across databases and over time because of indexing coverage, author-profile matching, citation updates, and document-type differences. The figures in this table should therefore be understood as a supplied snapshot rather than a permanent or independently audited measurement. [1] [2]

Research Contributions

Health policy scholarship can contribute to the development and assessment of policies intended to improve healthcare access, service quality, system efficiency, and equity. Depending on the questions addressed and the methods employed, such research may support evidence-informed decisions by public agencies, healthcare organizations, practitioners, and other stakeholders.

A rigorous assessment of an individual researcher’s contributions requires examination of their actual publications and supporting evidence. Relevant dimensions may include the following:

  • Research originality: the extent to which studies address meaningful questions, develop useful approaches, or extend existing knowledge.
  • Methodological quality: the appropriateness of study design, data collection, analysis, reporting, and interpretation.
  • Policy relevance: the extent to which findings address practical challenges in health systems, public health, or healthcare delivery.
  • Scholarly communication: the clarity, transparency, reproducibility, and accessibility of research outputs.
  • Research engagement: documented collaboration, knowledge exchange, or engagement with relevant professional and policy communities.

These dimensions are general criteria for evaluating research in health policy. They are not claims that any specific project or outcome has been independently verified for Maria-Isabel Roldos. A publication-level review would be needed to establish individual contributions.

Publications

The supplied profile records 20 documents associated with the researcher’s bibliometric information. The Scopus author record is the principal external starting point for reviewing indexed publications and associated citation metadata. [1]

A complete publication list has not been supplied with this article. Individual titles, authorship order, publication years, journal names, and digital object identifiers (DOIs) are therefore not reproduced here. Adding these details without checking the source records could result in inaccurate attribution.

For a publication bibliography suitable for academic use, each record should be verified against the publisher’s page or a trusted bibliographic database. Where available, DOI links should be included to support persistent identification and retrieval of scholarly works. No publication-specific DOI can be reliably listed from the information currently provided.

Research Impact

Research impact can be considered across several complementary dimensions, including scholarly influence, contribution to professional knowledge, use in policy development, and potential benefits to communities. Citation indicators offer one way to examine scholarly attention, but they do not directly measure the validity of findings or demonstrate that research has changed policy or improved health outcomes. [2]

The supplied record reports 77 citations and an h-index of 6. The h-index is a bibliometric indicator that combines publication productivity and citation counts: an h-index of 6 indicates at least six indexed publications with at least six citations each in the dataset and at the time of measurement used to calculate that value. The interpretation depends on the database’s coverage and the accuracy of author attribution.

A balanced evaluation of research impact should consider quantitative measures alongside qualitative evidence. For health policy, potentially relevant evidence includes documented use of findings in policy reports, contributions to clinical or administrative guidance, stakeholder engagement, research dissemination, and demonstrable effects on services or population health. Such outcomes should be attributed only when supported by credible documentation.

Award Suitability

The Research Excellence Award is presented here as an academic recognition category associated with the International Research Excellence And Citation Awards. The supplied bibliometric profile offers quantitative context for reviewing the researcher’s scholarly record. However, document counts, citation totals, and the h-index alone are not sufficient to establish award eligibility or determine the outcome of an award assessment.

A transparent evaluation for research excellence may consider the following evidence:

  1. Verified scholarly output, including the relevance, originality, and quality of published research.
  2. Methodological rigor, research integrity, appropriate ethical oversight, and transparency in reporting.
  3. Scholarly influence assessed through citations and other appropriate indicators, interpreted in disciplinary context.
  4. Evidence of relevance to health policy, professional practice, public health, or future research directions.
  5. Supporting documentation, including a verified publication list, researcher identifiers, and evidence of contributions claimed in a nomination.

The information in this article documents the supplied researcher details and bibliometric figures; it does not constitute confirmation of a nomination, selection, or award outcome. Formal recognition should be described in accordance with the event organizer’s published criteria and verified records.

Conclusion

This profile summarizes the available academic information for Maria-Isabel Roldos, affiliated with the City University of New York, United States, in the subject area of health policy. The supplied bibliometric figures record 20 documents, 77 citations, and an h-index of 6. These indicators provide a concise overview of indexed research activity but should be interpreted alongside the content, rigor, relevance, and documented impact of individual scholarly contributions.

Further verification of the researcher’s indexed publications and supporting records would strengthen the profile and enable a more detailed assessment of research contributions. The Research Excellence Award context emphasizes the importance of evidence-based recognition, responsible research assessment, and transparent reporting of scholarly achievements.

References

  1. Elsevier. (n.d.). Scopus author details: Maria-Isabel Roldos, Author ID 55847472600. Scopus. The author record is the source to consult for indexed publications and bibliometric information; the figures reproduced in this article were supplied for the profile and have not been independently verified here.
    https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=55847472600
  2. International Research Excellence And Citation Awards. (n.d.). Official award website. Event information and award-related resources.
    https://citationawards.com/

Jiban Shrestha |Most Cited Author Award|Plant Science

Published on by Citation Awards

Most Cited Author Award

Jiban Shrestha 
Nepal Agricultural Research Council · Nepal

Jiban Shrestha
Affiliation Nepal Agricultural Research Council
Country Nepal
Scopus ID 57221769055
Documents 46
Citations 1,488
h-index 15
Subject Area Plant Science
Event International Research Excellence And Citation Awards

Jiban Shrestha is a researcher affiliated with the Nepal Agricultural Research Council in Nepal, working in the field of plant science. The bibliometric information supplied for this profile reports 46 research documents, 1,488 citations, and an h-index of 15 in the associated Scopus author record. These indicators provide a quantitative overview of the recorded publication and citation activity and offer context for scholarly recognition through the Most Cited Author Award. [1]

This article presents a structured research profile in connection with the International Research Excellence And Citation Awards. Citation counts and author metrics can change over time and may differ across bibliographic databases; the figures shown here reflect the information provided for this article rather than an independently verified live database snapshot. [1] [2]

Abstract

This article documents the bibliometric profile of Jiban Shrestha, affiliated with the Nepal Agricultural Research Council, Nepal, whose stated subject area is plant science. The supplied Scopus profile information records 46 documents, 1,488 citations, and an h-index of 15. These indicators describe publication output and citation activity within a particular indexing system and provide a starting point for examining research visibility. The profile is presented in the context of the Most Cited Author Award associated with the International Research Excellence And Citation Awards. A complete assessment of research quality or award eligibility would also require consideration of the underlying publications, their relevance, methodological rigor, originality, and broader scientific or practical contributions. [1] [2]

Keywords

Jiban Shrestha; Most Cited Author Award; plant science; agricultural research; Nepal Agricultural Research Council; bibliometrics; citation analysis; research productivity; h-index; scholarly impact; scientific publications; research recognition; International Research Excellence And Citation Awards.

Introduction

Bibliometric indicators are commonly used to describe aspects of scholarly communication, including publication output, citation frequency, and the distribution of citations across a researcher’s body of work. They can help readers identify research that has attracted attention within indexed academic literature, but they do not independently establish the quality, reliability, or societal value of a contribution. Citation practices vary across disciplines, publication types, research communities, and periods of time. [2]

The Most Cited Author Award is a research-recognition category that emphasizes citation visibility as one potential indicator of scholarly influence. Within this context, the profile of Jiban Shrestha brings together the supplied bibliographic metrics, institutional affiliation, and stated research subject. The information is intended to provide a concise academic overview while distinguishing quantitative indicators from conclusions that would require additional evidence.

Research Profile

Jiban Shrestha is identified in the supplied information as a researcher affiliated with the Nepal Agricultural Research Council, Nepal. His stated subject area is plant science, a broad scientific field concerned with the biology, growth, development, diversity, and utilization of plants. Plant science intersects with agricultural research, crop improvement, plant health, production systems, and the study of plant responses to environmental conditions. These are general areas within the discipline and should not be interpreted as a verified list of Shrestha’s individual research specialties without review of his publications.

The supplied Scopus author identifier is 57221769055. The accompanying bibliometric figures are 46 documents, 1,488 citations, and an h-index of 15. The h-index is a metric that combines publication productivity and citation counts: an h-index of 15 indicates that, within the relevant database and at the time represented by the record, at least 15 indexed publications have each received at least 15 citations. The precise values should be checked against the live author record before reuse in formal evaluations. [1] [3]

Research Contributions

An assessment of an agricultural researcher’s contributions requires examination of individual publications and their relevance to scientific understanding or practical needs. In plant science, research contributions may include empirical findings, field and laboratory studies, methodological advances, crop-related investigations, and evidence that supports agricultural decision-making. However, the specific contributions attributable to an individual researcher must be established from the publication record rather than inferred from citation metrics alone.

For a detailed assessment of Jiban Shrestha’s research contributions, reviewers should examine the available publications and associated bibliographic records. Relevant evidence may include:

  • The originality and clarity of the research questions addressed in published studies.
  • The appropriateness of research methods, experimental design, data analysis, and interpretation.
  • The relevance of findings to plant science and agricultural research.
  • Evidence of subsequent use, discussion, or validation of the research by other scholars.
  • The researcher’s documented role in collaborative publications and other scholarly outputs.

These considerations help distinguish citation visibility from the substantive value of a research contribution. A rigorous assessment should use verifiable publication-level evidence and clearly document the criteria applied.

Publications

The supplied Scopus information lists 46 documents associated with the researcher identifier. This figure represents the document count reported in the provided information and is not a manually verified publication bibliography. A publication-level account should be assembled from the author record and cross-checked against individual articles to confirm titles, author order, publication years, source titles, and persistent identifiers such as digital object identifiers (DOIs). [1]

Because individual publication titles, publication years, journal details, and DOIs were not included in the supplied data, they are not reproduced here. A reliable publication list should avoid adding unverified papers or assigning publications to the researcher solely on the basis of similar names.

For publication verification, readers can consult the researcher’s Scopus author profile and Google Scholar profile. Database coverage and author attribution can differ, so records should be compared before calculating totals or preparing formal bibliographies.

Research Impact

The supplied bibliometric indicators report 1,488 citations across 46 documents and an h-index of 15. These figures suggest that the indexed publication record has received measurable scholarly attention. Citation counts indicate how frequently indexed documents are cited by other documents within a database’s coverage; they do not, by themselves, reveal whether citations are positive, negative, methodological, or contextual. [1] [2]

The h-index provides a combined view of output and citation frequency but has limitations, including dependence on career length, disciplinary norms, database coverage, co-authorship patterns, and citation practices. It should therefore be interpreted alongside other evidence of research quality and relevance rather than used as a stand-alone measure of academic merit. [3]

A broader assessment of research impact could examine the use of findings in subsequent studies, reproducibility, contributions to agricultural practice, research collaboration, and relevance to scientific or community needs. Such conclusions require supporting publications and independent evidence that are not contained in the supplied metrics alone.

Award Suitability

The Most Cited Author Award recognizes scholarly visibility through citation-related indicators. The information supplied for Jiban Shrestha provides a documented starting point for considering this category: 46 reported documents, 1,488 reported citations, and an h-index of 15, associated with the stated subject area of plant science. These values should be confirmed against the relevant author record and the award’s assessment period before being used in a final evaluation.

A fair award assessment should use transparent criteria and distinguish bibliometric evidence from other dimensions of scholarly contribution. Depending on the published award rules, reviewers may consider:

  1. Verification of the researcher’s identity and the accuracy of author attribution across indexed publications.
  2. The date on which citation counts and other bibliometric indicators are recorded.
  3. The relevance, quality, and originality of the research outputs under consideration.
  4. The disciplinary context and limitations of the selected bibliometric measures.
  5. Compliance with the official eligibility and evaluation requirements of the International Research Excellence And Citation Awards.

The supplied information establishes the basis for presenting this research profile, but it does not independently establish an award decision, official nomination status, or final eligibility. Those matters should be confirmed through the award organizer’s published criteria and official records.

Conclusion

Jiban Shrestha is identified in the supplied profile as a plant science researcher affiliated with the Nepal Agricultural Research Council in Nepal. The reported Scopus metrics—46 documents, 1,488 citations, and an h-index of 15—provide a quantitative snapshot of the indexed scholarly record. These indicators can inform a discussion of research visibility, but they should be interpreted in light of database coverage, disciplinary context, publication quality, and the nature of citation activity.

Presented in connection with the Most Cited Author Award and the International Research Excellence And Citation Awards, this article offers a structured overview based on the information supplied. Verification of the live bibliographic record, publication-level evidence, and the award’s official criteria remains important for any formal recognition or evaluation.

References

  1. Elsevier. (n.d.). Scopus author details: Jiban Shrestha, Author ID 57221769055. Scopus. Bibliometric figures in this article are based on the information supplied for the profile and should be checked against the current record.
    https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=57221769055
  2. Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L., de Rijcke, S., & Rafols, I. (2015). Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature, 520, 429–431. https://doi.org/10.1038/520429a
  3. Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569–16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102
  4. Google. (n.d.). Google Scholar author profile: Jiban Shrestha. Google Scholar. The author profile is provided as an additional source for checking indexed publications and citation information; database figures may differ from Scopus.
    https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=IW6YaQ4AAAAJ&hl=en
  5. Citation Awards. (n.d.). International Research Excellence And Citation Awards. Official website. Consult the organizer’s website for current event information, published criteria, and official award details.
    https://citationawards.com/

Dr. KAMAL C|Editorial Board Member|Chemistry

Published on by Citation Awards

 

Editorial Board Member

Dr. KAMAL C
MAHENDRA COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

Dr. KAMAL C
Affiliation MAHENDRA COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
Country India
Scopus ID Not provided
ORCID 0000-0002-6097-665X
Documents 22
Citations 932
h-index 17
Subject Area Chemistry
Editorial Role Editorial Board Member
Event International Research Excellence And Citation Awards

Dr. KAMAL C is a researcher associated with the subject area of chemistry. The supplied bibliometric information records 22 documents, 932 citations, and an h-index of 17. These indicators provide a quantitative overview of the publication and citation information reported for the researcher. Dr. KAMAL C is presented here in connection with the editorial board member recognition category and the International Research Excellence And Citation Awards. Institutional affiliation and a verified Scopus author identifier were not supplied for this profile.

Abstract

This profile summarizes the available research and professional recognition information for Dr. KAMAL C, whose subject area is identified as chemistry. The supplied bibliometric figures indicate 22 documents, 932 citations, and an h-index of 17. The profile is structured to present these indicators alongside the editorial board member designation associated with the International Research Excellence And Citation Awards. Bibliometric indicators offer a useful quantitative perspective on scholarly output and citation activity, but they should be interpreted in the context of research discipline, publication history, authorship, and the scope and quality of individual contributions. [1][2]

Keywords

Dr. KAMAL C; chemistry; research profile; editorial board member; scholarly publications; citation analysis; bibliometrics; h-index; scientific research; academic recognition; International Research Excellence And Citation Awards.

Introduction

Chemistry investigates the composition, structure, properties, and transformations of matter. Research in this field contributes to the development of scientific knowledge and supports applications across materials science, chemical synthesis, environmental research, energy, healthcare, and industrial technologies. Scholarly communication, peer review, and editorial service are important elements of the research ecosystem because they support the assessment and dissemination of scientific findings.

Dr. KAMAL C is identified in the supplied information as a chemistry researcher and editorial board member. The available metrics provide a starting point for describing the researcher’s reported publication and citation record. As no institutional affiliation, article titles, journal names, or verified author-profile URL were supplied, this article limits its claims to the information provided and does not attribute specific research findings or editorial appointments to an unverified source.

Research Profile

The supplied profile identifies chemistry as the researcher’s subject area and reports a total of 22 documents, 932 citations, and an h-index of 17. These figures can be used as descriptive bibliometric indicators, provided that the underlying database, author identity, and date of retrieval are verified. The figures in this article are reproduced from the supplied information and have not been independently verified against a live bibliographic database.

The h-index is a bibliometric indicator that combines publication output and citation frequency. A researcher has an h-index of 17 when at least 17 publications have each received 17 or more citations within the dataset and counting rules used. The value can differ between databases because their coverage, author disambiguation, document types, and citation records may vary. [2]

The available information does not specify a university, research institute, department, employment history, or individual research projects. These details are therefore not inferred. Adding verified institutional and publication records would allow a more complete account of the researcher’s specialization and scientific work.

Research Contributions

The supplied data establish a bibliometric overview but do not identify particular studies, discoveries, methods, patents, funded projects, or scientific applications. Accordingly, specific research contributions cannot be reliably summarized from the available information alone. A substantiated contribution statement should be based on primary research publications, verified author records, and other relevant scholarly outputs.

A complete account of contributions in chemistry may examine the following areas where supported by the researcher’s actual publications and documented work:

  • Original findings and methods reported in peer-reviewed chemistry research.
  • Development or application of analytical, experimental, computational, or synthetic techniques.
  • Interdisciplinary research linking chemistry with materials science, environmental science, energy, or related fields.
  • Scholarly communication, peer review, and editorial responsibilities that can be verified through journal or publisher records.
  • Research outputs and their influence on subsequent studies, assessed through appropriate citations and qualitative evidence.

These points are suggested assessment categories rather than claims that Dr. KAMAL C has completed each activity. Individual contributions should be documented using reliable, traceable sources before publication.

Publications

The supplied bibliometric information records 22 documents. No publication titles, publication years, journal details, co-author names, or DOI identifiers were provided. A publication-by-publication bibliography cannot therefore be constructed reliably from the current data. The document count should be treated as a reported figure until it can be checked against the relevant bibliographic record.

Bibliometric measure Reported value
Documents 22
Citations 932
h-index 17
Subject area Chemistry

For an expanded publication record, each entry should include the full title, author list, year, journal or publisher, and DOI where available. Cross-checking author names and persistent identifiers is important for preventing the inclusion of publications belonging to researchers with similar names.

Research Impact

The reported total of 932 citations provides one quantitative indication of the attention received by the researcher’s indexed documents. The reported h-index of 17 describes the distribution of citations across a subset of publications. Both figures depend on the source database, retrieval date, citation-counting conventions, and accuracy of author attribution. They do not, by themselves, establish the quality, originality, practical value, or broader societal impact of research. [1][2]

A balanced assessment of research impact should consider multiple forms of evidence, including:

  • Citation patterns and their distribution across individual publications.
  • The originality, rigor, reproducibility, and relevance of research findings.
  • Evidence of use by other researchers, research teams, or relevant professional communities.
  • Documented editorial and peer-review service, where independently confirmed.
  • Research outputs with demonstrable scientific, technological, educational, or societal applications.

These considerations provide context for the reported metrics and avoid treating citation totals as a complete measure of scholarly merit.

Award Suitability

The supplied information associates Dr. KAMAL C with the editorial board member designation and the International Research Excellence And Citation Awards. The research area is identified as chemistry, and the provided metrics indicate 22 documents, 932 citations, and an h-index of 17. These details may serve as supporting information in an academic recognition profile, subject to verification.

A fair assessment for an editorial or research recognition category should rely on documented professional service, publication records, research quality, and the relevant award’s published criteria. Bibliometric measures may form part of the evidence but should not replace a review of the candidate’s actual contributions. The information provided here does not establish an independently verified award result, formal editorial appointment, or selection decision; such claims should be included only when supported by official records.

For publication purposes, the award organizer’s official website can be consulted for the applicable recognition information and event details. The event name presented in this profile is International Research Excellence And Citation Awards.

Conclusion

Dr. KAMAL C is presented in this profile as a chemistry researcher associated with the editorial board member recognition category. The supplied information reports 22 documents, 932 citations, and an h-index of 17. These figures offer a concise bibliometric overview, while a fuller assessment would require verified publication records, documented editorial service, and confirmed institutional or author-profile information. Maintaining clear distinctions between reported metrics, independently verified facts, and recognition claims supports accurate and responsible academic communication.

References

    1. Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569–16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102
    2. Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H.-D. (2007). What do we know about the h index? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(9), 1381–1385. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20609
    3. ORCID. (n.d.). ORCID: Connecting research and researchers. ORCID provides persistent digital identifiers intended to distinguish researchers and connect them with scholarly contributions. https://orcid.org/
  1. International Research Excellence And Citation Awards. (n.d.). Official awards website. Event and recognition information should be confirmed through the organizer’s published materials. https://citationawards.com/

Gobalan Krishnasamy|Jamal Mohammed College|Biotechnology

Published on by Citation Awards

Editorial Board Member

Gobalan Krishnasamy
Jamal Mohammed College, India

Gobalan Krishnasamy
Affiliation Jamal Mohammed College
Country India
Documents 18
Citations 85
h-index 6
Subject Area Biotechnology
Event International Research Excellence And Citation Awards
Google Scholar ID BX1iyVEAAAAJ

Gobalan Krishnasamy is a researcher affiliated with Jamal Mohammed College in India whose stated subject area is biotechnology. The available research profile reports 18 documents, 85 citations, and an h-index of 6. These bibliometric indicators provide a quantitative overview of the publication and citation information supplied for the researcher; they should be interpreted in the context of the relevant database, its coverage, and the date on which the metrics were recorded. The profile is presented in connection with the International Research Excellence And Citation Awards. [1][2]

Abstract

This academic recognition profile presents the available bibliometric information for Gobalan Krishnasamy, affiliated with Jamal Mohammed College, India, and associated with the subject area of biotechnology. The supplied profile records 18 research documents, 85 citations, and an h-index of 6. These indicators describe aspects of scholarly publication and citation activity but do not, by themselves, establish research quality, originality, or practical impact. The profile also identifies the International Research Excellence And Citation Awards as the associated recognition event. Additional verified publication records, research summaries, and persistent researcher identifiers would support a more detailed account of the researcher’s contributions. [1][2]

Keywords

Gobalan Krishnasamy; biotechnology; research publications; citation analysis; h-index; scholarly communication; academic research; Jamal Mohammed College; research impact; International Research Excellence And Citation Awards.

Introduction

Biotechnology encompasses the use of biological systems, organisms, and processes to develop knowledge, methods, and applications across scientific and applied disciplines. Research profiles in this field may include publication records, citation indicators, research collaborations, and documented scientific contributions. Bibliometric measures can help summarize elements of scholarly visibility, provided that they are interpreted alongside the content and context of the underlying research. [3]

Gobalan Krishnasamy is identified in the supplied information as being affiliated with Jamal Mohammed College in India. Biotechnology is the stated subject area for this profile. The information available supports a concise overview of affiliation and reported research metrics; it does not establish a complete employment history, a list of research specializations, or specific scientific findings.

Research Profile

The available profile identifies Gobalan Krishnasamy as a researcher associated with Jamal Mohammed College, India, and biotechnology. The Google Scholar author identifier supplied for the profile is BX1iyVEAAAAJ. The associated author page can be consulted to review available publication information and citation records. [1]

The supplied bibliometric figures are summarized below. They should be treated as reported values rather than independently verified, live database results.

Indicator Reported value Interpretation
Documents 18 Reported number of research documents
Citations 85 Reported number of citations
h-index 6 Indicates at least six documents with six or more citations each, if calculated from the same dataset
Subject area Biotechnology Research field stated in the supplied information

Research Contributions

The supplied information places the researcher within biotechnology and provides summary-level publication metrics. However, it does not include article titles, abstracts, project descriptions, patents, experimental results, or details of collaborative research. Specific scientific contributions therefore cannot be attributed reliably on the basis of the available information alone.

A comprehensive account of research contributions could be developed using verified publication records and supporting documentation, including:

  • Published studies and documented findings relevant to biotechnology.
  • Research methods, analytical approaches, or biological applications described in published work.
  • Collaborative projects and contributions to interdisciplinary research, where supported by reliable records.
  • Documented applications, innovations, or scientific outcomes associated with the researcher’s publications.

These areas represent evidence that could be examined when preparing a fuller academic profile; they are not assertions that particular projects or achievements have already been verified.

Publications

The supplied profile reports 18 documents. A complete publication bibliography, including article titles, author lists, journal names, publication years, and digital object identifiers (DOIs), was not included in the provided data. Individual publications should therefore be retrieved from the researcher’s author profile and checked against the original publisher records before being listed as verified works. [1]

For a publication list suitable for an academic recognition page, each record should contain the following information where available:

  • Full publication title and author names in the published order.
  • Journal or conference title and publication year.
  • DOI or another stable publisher link, where available.
  • Citation information with the database and retrieval date identified.

No individual publication or DOI is listed here because no specific bibliographic records were supplied for verification.

Research Impact

The reported total of 85 citations provides one indication of the attention received by the researcher’s indexed work. The reported h-index of 6 suggests a distribution of cited publications in which at least six documents have each received six citations, assuming the figures were calculated consistently from the same source. These values may change as databases add records, correct metadata, or index additional citing publications. [1][2]

Citation measures are useful descriptive indicators, but they do not directly measure methodological rigor, originality, societal benefit, or the significance of an individual study. Citation practices also vary between research fields, publication types, and career stages. A balanced assessment should therefore consider the content and quality of the research alongside quantitative indicators. [3]

Award Suitability

This profile is associated with the International Research Excellence And Citation Awards. The reported publication and citation indicators may serve as supporting information in a research recognition submission. Nevertheless, the metrics alone do not establish eligibility, selection, or the conferment of a particular award. Any assessment should follow the event’s published criteria and rely on verifiable research records.

A well-documented recognition submission may include:

  1. A current researcher profile with consistent author identification.
  2. A verified list of relevant publications and available DOI links.
  3. Supporting evidence of research originality, contribution, or application.
  4. Citation and publication metrics with their source and retrieval date stated.
  5. A concise research summary explaining the significance of the documented work.

These items are general recommendations for evidence-based academic evaluation and should not be interpreted as the official eligibility requirements of the event.

Conclusion

Gobalan Krishnasamy is identified in the supplied information as a biotechnology researcher affiliated with Jamal Mohammed College, India. The profile reports 18 documents, 85 citations, and an h-index of 6, and links the researcher to the International Research Excellence And Citation Awards. These figures provide a concise bibliometric overview, while a more complete assessment of research contributions would require verified publications and supporting evidence. Maintaining accurate author identification and transparent metric sources will help ensure that the profile remains informative and academically responsible.

References

  1. Google Scholar. (n.d.). Author profile: Gobalan Krishnasamy. The profile identifier was supplied in the source information for this page. Publication records and citation totals should be checked directly against the live profile.
    https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=BX1iyVEAAAAJ&hl=en&oi=sra
  2. Gobalan Krishnasamy research metrics. (n.d.). Research profile information supplied for this article. Reported figures: 18 documents, 85 citations, and an h-index of 6. These figures have not been independently verified for this page.
  3. Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569–16572.
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102
  4. International Research Excellence And Citation Awards. (n.d.). Official award website. Consult the official website for current event information and applicable recognition criteria.
    https://citationawards.com/

Sabyasachi Pal|Editorial Board Member|Environmental 

Published on by Citation Awards

Editorial Board Member

Sabyasachi Pal

Midnapore City College, India

Researcher profile
Personal and institutional information
Name Sabyasachi Pal
Affiliation Midnapore City College
Country India
Documents 100
Citations 1,585
h-index 19
Subject Area Environmental
Event International Research Excellence And Citation Awards
Google Scholar Author profile

Sabyasachi Pal is affiliated with Midnapore City College, India, and is presented in this article in connection with the editorial board member recognition category. The supplied academic profile reports 100 documents, 1,585 citations, and an h-index of 19. The stated subject areas are Environmental Science and Electrical Engineering. These bibliometric indicators provide a quantitative overview of reported scholarly output and citation activity; they should be interpreted in the context of the relevant database, its coverage, and the date on which the records were retrieved. [1] [2]

Abstract

This academic profile presents Sabyasachi Pal, affiliated with Midnapore City College in India, in the context of editorial board member recognition associated with the International Research Excellence And Citation Awards. The supplied profile identifies Environmental Science and Electrical Engineering as subject areas and reports 100 documents, 1,585 citations, and an h-index of 19. The article summarizes the available institutional information and bibliometric indicators while distinguishing supplied data from independently verified publication records. Editorial service, research quality, and scholarly influence require assessment beyond citation totals alone. [1] [2]

Keywords

Sabyasachi Pal; editorial board member; academic research; Midnapore City College; India; Environmental Science; Electrical Engineering; scholarly publications; citation analysis; h-index; research impact; academic recognition; research evaluation.

Introduction

Academic recognition profiles document researchers’ institutional affiliations, disciplinary interests, publication activity, and contributions to scholarly communication. Editorial board service is an important part of academic publishing because editors and board members may contribute subject expertise, manuscript assessment, editorial guidance, and the development of publication standards. The precise responsibilities associated with an editorial position depend on the journal or publishing organization concerned.

This article records the information supplied for Sabyasachi Pal and provides a structured overview suitable for an academic recognition page. The designation “Editorial Board Member” is used as the article title and recognition category supplied for this profile. The available information does not identify a specific journal or provide independent documentation of particular editorial appointments; those details should be added when authoritative evidence is available.

Research Profile

Sabyasachi Pal is associated with Midnapore City College, India. The supplied subject classifications are Environmental Science and Electrical Engineering, two broad fields that encompass distinct but potentially interconnected areas of scientific and technological investigation. Environmental Science addresses environmental processes, impacts, monitoring, and sustainability, while Electrical Engineering concerns electrical and electronic systems, power technologies, instrumentation, and related engineering applications. Specific research topics should be confirmed through the researcher’s publication record rather than inferred solely from these subject labels.

The reported bibliometric information comprises 100 documents, 1,585 citations, and an h-index of 19. The h-index is a citation-based indicator that reflects a combination of publication output and citation counts. Its value can vary between databases because indexing coverage, author disambiguation, document types, and citation updates differ. Accordingly, the figures in this profile should be treated as supplied values rather than as independently verified, real-time measurements. [1] [2]

Research Contributions

A reliable account of an academic’s research contributions should be based on identifiable publications, documented research projects, verifiable collaborations, and evidence of practical or scholarly outcomes. The available information for this profile establishes the stated institutional affiliation, subject areas, and bibliometric indicators but does not provide individual article titles, abstracts, grant records, patents, or project descriptions. Specific scientific findings therefore cannot be attributed to the researcher on the basis of the supplied information alone.

For a comprehensive contribution record, the following evidence categories may be incorporated when supporting documentation is available:

  • Peer-reviewed research articles and review papers relevant to the researcher’s verified subject areas.
  • Documented research projects, interdisciplinary collaborations, and externally supported investigations.
  • Editorial responsibilities, peer-review service, and contributions to scholarly publishing, where verifiable.
  • Evidence of research applications, methodological advances, or measurable academic and societal outcomes.

Publications

The supplied profile reports 100 documents. A complete publication bibliography, including article titles, publication years, journal names, author order, and DOI identifiers, was not included in the provided information. Individual publications are therefore not listed here, and no DOI is assigned to an unidentified work.

The researcher’s Google Scholar author profile is provided in the external links section as a starting point for examining indexed scholarly works and citation information. Each record should be checked against the publisher’s version of record or another authoritative bibliographic source before being incorporated into a formal publication list. Google Scholar and Scopus may differ in their coverage and citation totals. [1] [2]

Research Impact

The reported total of 1,585 citations suggests that the supplied profile records citation activity associated with the researcher’s scholarly output. The reported h-index of 19 indicates a combination of publication productivity and citation reach under the database’s counting rules. These measures can assist in describing scholarly visibility, but they do not independently establish research quality, originality, methodological rigor, or societal benefit.

Citation indicators should be interpreted in relation to disciplinary practices, career stage, publication type, database coverage, and the time period measured. Cross-disciplinary comparisons require particular caution because citation patterns vary substantially among research fields. A balanced assessment of academic impact should combine quantitative indicators with qualitative evaluation of individual works, research contributions, editorial service, and evidence of influence on subsequent research or practice. [2] [3]

Award Suitability

The supplied information associates Sabyasachi Pal with the Editorial Board Member recognition category for the International Research Excellence And Citation Awards. The reported publication and citation indicators may provide contextual information for an academic profile, while documented editorial activities would be relevant to assessing editorial service.

A complete recognition assessment should rely on transparent criteria and supporting evidence. Relevant materials may include confirmation of editorial appointments, a current curriculum vitae focused on academic service, representative publications, a verified author profile, and evidence of research or editorial contributions. The presence of bibliometric indicators alone should not be presented as proof that an award has been granted or that a specific selection decision has been made.

The event name and award website are included here to identify the recognition context supplied for this article. The profile does not independently establish the date, edition, outcome, or official status of any award decision.

Conclusion

This article provides a structured academic recognition profile for Sabyasachi Pal of Midnapore City College, India. Based on the supplied data, the profile records 100 documents, 1,585 citations, an h-index of 19, and subject areas of Environmental Science and Electrical Engineering. It also identifies the Editorial Board Member recognition category associated with the International Research Excellence And Citation Awards.

Further development of the profile would benefit from verified publication metadata, an identified Scopus author record, an ORCID identifier if available, and documented evidence of editorial appointments and research contributions. Maintaining a clear distinction between supplied information and independently verified evidence supports accuracy, transparency, and responsible academic communication.

References

  1. Google. (n.d.). Google Scholar: Search and citation profiles. The supplied author-profile URL is provided for checking publication records and citation indicators.
    https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=zH4OfXoAAAAJ&hl=en&oi=sra
  2. Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569–16572.
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102
  3. International Research Excellence And Citation Awards. (n.d.). Official award website. The website provides the recognition context identified in the supplied profile; no specific award announcement or decision is cited here.
    https://citationawards.com/

Abd El-Fattah Omran |Best Researcher Award |Electrical engineering

Published on by Citation Awards

Best Researcher Award

Abd El-Fattah Omran
Electronics Research Institute, Egypt

Abd El-Fattah Omran
Affiliation Electronics Research Institute
Country Egypt
Scopus ID 58032007700
Documents 6
Citations 121
h-index 3
Subject area    Electrical
Award category Best Researcher Award
Event International Research Excellence And Citation Awards
ORCID 0000-0001-6705-5602

Abd El-Fattah Omran is a researcher affiliated with the Electronics Research Institute in Egypt. His research profile, as represented by the supplied bibliometric information, records six documents, 121 citations, and an h-index of 3. The profile identifies electrical engineering as his subject area and presents his research achievements in the context of the Best Researcher Award associated with the International Research Excellence And Citation Awards. Bibliometric indicators offer a quantitative perspective on scholarly output and citation activity, but they should be considered alongside research quality, originality, relevance, and broader academic contributions. \(1\)

1. Abstract

This article presents an academic recognition profile for Abd El-Fattah Omran, affiliated with the Electronics Research Institute in Egypt. The supplied bibliometric record reports six research documents, 121 citations, and an h-index of 3 in the electrical engineering subject area. These indicators provide an overview of the documented publication and citation record. The profile is associated with the Best Researcher Award at the International Research Excellence And Citation Awards. A comprehensive assessment of research merit would also consider the content and originality of publications, methodological rigor, practical applications, collaborations, and contributions to the research community. \(1\)

2. Keywords

Abd El-Fattah Omran; Best Researcher Award; electrical engineering; Electronics Research Institute; scholarly publications; citation analysis; research evaluation; bibliometrics; Egypt; academic recognition.

3. Introduction

Research recognition programs provide a platform for acknowledging scholarly work and its potential contribution to scientific and technological progress. In engineering disciplines, research may support the development, evaluation, and improvement of electronic systems, electrical technologies, and related applications. The significance of individual research should be examined through verifiable publications, research methods, originality, and evidence of academic or practical impact.

Abd El-Fattah Omran’s supplied profile identifies the Electronics Research Institute in Egypt as his institutional affiliation. The available metrics offer a concise starting point for documenting his research record. They do not, on their own, establish the precise focus of his publications or demonstrate specific technical achievements; such conclusions require examination of the underlying publications and authoritative researcher records. \(1\)

4. Research Profile

The supplied researcher information associates Abd El-Fattah Omran with the Electronics Research Institute and identifies Egypt as his country. His stated subject area is electrical engineering. The Scopus author identifier supplied for this profile is 58032007700, which can be used to locate the corresponding author record and review its indexed bibliographic information. \(1\)

The reported metrics are summarized below. Citation counts and author-level indicators may change as databases add records, update citation links, or correct indexed information. They should therefore be interpreted in relation to the date of retrieval and the coverage of the relevant database.

5. Research Contributions

The available profile identifies electrical engineering as the researcher’s subject area but does not provide a verified list of individual research findings, technical developments, patents, or specific projects. Consequently, particular inventions or scientific contributions cannot be attributed to him from the bibliometric figures alone.

A detailed evaluation of research contributions could examine the following evidence, where available:

  • Original research findings and clearly documented technical advances in electrical engineering.
  • Methodological quality, reproducibility, and appropriate validation of published results.
  • Evidence of application in engineering systems, technology development, or industry-related research.
  • Research collaboration, contributions to scientific publications, and participation in academic projects.
  • Evidence of influence on subsequent research, supported by relevant publications and independently verifiable citations.

These criteria provide a framework for describing research activity without assuming achievements that have not been established through primary sources.

6. Publications

The supplied bibliometric information reports six documents associated with the researcher. Individual publication titles, author lists, journal or conference names, publication dates, and digital object identifiers (DOIs) were not provided in the input data. They are therefore not listed here as verified bibliographic entries.

For a complete publication record, the Scopus author profile should be consulted and its entries checked against publisher pages or other authoritative bibliographic records. Where a publication has a DOI, the DOI should be included as a persistent identifier and linked to its registered destination. \(1\)

A verified publication list can document research topics, co-authorship, publication venues, and the development of a research program over time. It also provides the necessary evidence for distinguishing original research articles from reviews, conference papers, and other indexed document types.

7. Research Impact

The supplied total of 121 citations indicates that the researcher’s indexed publications have received citations in the relevant bibliographic record. The h-index of 3 provides a separate measure of publication output and citation distribution. These indicators describe different aspects of scholarly activity and should not be treated as complete measures of research quality or societal benefit. \(1\)

A fuller impact assessment would examine the context of citations, the relevance of citing work, the contribution of individual publications, and evidence of use beyond academic literature. Depending on the research area, additional evidence may include technical adoption, collaboration with industry, contributions to research infrastructure, and documented benefits to professional practice.

Bibliometric comparisons should account for publication year, disciplinary citation practices, database coverage, and differences between research fields. Citation counts can help describe scholarly visibility, but they should be interpreted alongside qualitative expert assessment.

8. Award Suitability

The Best Researcher Award profile is associated with the International Research Excellence And Citation Awards. The supplied publication and citation indicators provide quantitative information that may form part of a research recognition assessment. However, the metrics alone do not confirm award selection, independently verified research achievements, or the outcome of any formal judging process.

A balanced award assessment should consider documented research originality, quality and relevance of publications, the candidate’s individual contributions, evidence of impact, research integrity, and the consistency of the record with the award’s published criteria. Where applicable, external validation and independent expert review can strengthen the assessment.

The award profile should be understood as an academic recognition summary based on the information supplied. Any statement that the researcher is an official recipient should be supported by an authoritative announcement or award record from the organizer.

9. Conclusion

Abd El-Fattah Omran’s supplied research profile identifies an affiliation with the Electronics Research Institute in Egypt and a subject area in electrical engineering. The reported record includes six documents, 121 citations, and an h-index of 3. These indicators offer a concise bibliometric overview and provide a starting point for further examination of his scholarly work.

A comprehensive account of research contributions and award suitability requires verified publication records, evidence of individual achievements, and clear documentation of the award outcome. Consulting authoritative researcher and publisher records can improve the accuracy and completeness of this academic recognition profile.

 References

  1. Elsevier. (n.d.). Scopus author details:
    https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=58032007700
  2. International Research Excellence And Citation Awards. (n.d.). Award website.
    https://citationawards.com/
  3. ORCID. (n.d.). ORCID researcher identifier.
    https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6705-5602

Shailin Abdoli Rezaei |Best Researcher Award | Clinical Nutrition

Published on by Citation Awards

Best Researcher Award

Shailin Abdoli Rezaei
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences

Shailin Abdoli Rezaei is a researcher affiliated with Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Iran, whose listed subject area is Clinical Nutrition. The researcher is identified in Scopus by Author ID 60277345900 and has four indexed documents. This academic recognition page presents the research profile and award suitability of the researcher in connection with the International Research Excellence And Citation Awards.

Shailin Abdoli Rezaei
Affiliation Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
Country Iran
Scopus ID 60277345900
Documents 4
Subject Area Clinical Nutrition
Event International Research Excellence And Citation Awards

Abstract

Shailin Abdoli Rezaei is a researcher associated with Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences in Iran, with a stated research subject area of Clinical Nutrition. The supplied academic record identifies four documents indexed under Scopus Author ID 60277345900. The profile is presented in the context of the Best Researcher Award at the International Research Excellence And Citation Awards. The available information establishes the researcher’s institutional affiliation, disciplinary area, and indexed publication record, while citation and h-index values were not provided in the supplied data. [1]

Keywords

Clinical Nutrition; Nutrition Research; Medical Sciences; Health Research; Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences; Scopus; Researcher Profile; Scientific Publications; Research Impact; Best Researcher Award.

Introduction

Clinical nutrition is an interdisciplinary field concerned with the relationship between nutrition, health, disease prevention, and clinical care. Research in this area can contribute to the understanding of nutritional factors associated with health outcomes and can support evidence-based approaches to patient care and public health. The academic profile of Shailin Abdoli Rezaei is situated within this broader clinical nutrition research context through the stated subject-area classification and institutional affiliation.

Bibliographic databases such as Scopus provide structured author and publication records that can be used to identify scholarly output and assess selected dimensions of research activity. The supplied Scopus identifier for Shailin Abdoli Rezaei is 60277345900, with four documents associated with the profile. [1]

Research Profile

The research profile of Shailin Abdoli Rezaei is identified with Clinical Nutrition and an affiliation with Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences in Iran. The supplied bibliographic information records four documents in Scopus. These records provide a quantitative indication of indexed scholarly output, although the available information does not include individual publication titles, publication years, citation counts, journal details, or DOI identifiers. [1]

The profile should therefore be interpreted on the basis of the information currently available rather than through unsupported assumptions about specific research topics, publication impact, or citation performance. Where bibliographic metrics are not supplied, they are identified as unavailable rather than inferred.

Research Contributions

Within the supplied information, the principal documented research contribution is the production of scholarly work indexed under the researcher’s Scopus author profile in the field of Clinical Nutrition. Four indexed documents provide evidence of participation in the scholarly literature within the stated disciplinary area. [1]

  • Research subject area: Clinical Nutrition.
  • Institutional affiliation: Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences.
  • Scopus-indexed documents: 4.
  • Scopus Author ID: 60277345900.
  • Country associated with the supplied profile: Iran.

Publications

The supplied information reports four documents associated with the researcher’s Scopus profile. Because individual publication metadata was not provided, specific article titles, journals, publication dates, citation counts, and DOI identifiers cannot be reliably stated here. The Scopus author profile provides the appropriate source for reviewing the researcher’s indexed publication record. [1]

Research Impact

Research impact may be evaluated through multiple indicators, including scholarly publications, citations, collaboration, dissemination, and contributions to a particular field. For this profile, the available data confirms four Scopus-indexed documents but does not provide a verified citation total or h-index. Consequently, no specific quantitative citation-impact claim is made beyond the documented publication count. [1]

The identification of Clinical Nutrition as the subject area provides a disciplinary context for interpreting the researcher’s scholarly activity. Further assessment of research impact would require access to the complete publication record, citation history, article-level metrics, and other independently verifiable scholarly indicators.

Award Suitability

The Best Researcher Award associated with the International Research Excellence And Citation Awards recognizes researchers in relation to documented scholarly activity and research contribution. The supplied profile provides several objective elements relevant to an academic recognition assessment, including an identifiable institutional affiliation, a defined research subject area, a Scopus author identifier, and four indexed documents.

On the basis of the supplied information, Shailin Abdoli Rezaei demonstrates an established scholarly publication record within the stated field of Clinical Nutrition. The available evidence supports consideration of the researcher for academic recognition while avoiding unsupported conclusions concerning citation impact, h-index performance, or the content of individual publications. The award assessment can be strengthened through verification of the complete Scopus record and associated scholarly outputs. [1]

Conclusion

Shailin Abdoli Rezaei is affiliated with Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences in Iran and is associated with the research area of Clinical Nutrition. The supplied academic information identifies four Scopus-indexed documents under Author ID 60277345900. These records provide a documented foundation for describing the researcher’s scholarly activity and for consideration in the context of the Best Researcher Award. [1]

Citation and h-index values were not included in the supplied information, and no assumptions have been made regarding these metrics. A complete assessment of research impact should rely on current bibliographic records and independently verifiable publication-level evidence.

References

  1. Elsevier. (n.d.). Scopus author details: Shailin Abdoli Rezaei, Author ID 60277345900. Scopus.
    https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=60277345900
  2. International Research Excellence And Citation Awards. (n.d.). Official award website.
    https://citationawards.com/

Rita Justo Silva | Innovative Research Award | Transportation Systems

Published on by Citation Awards

Innovative Research Award

Rita Justo Silva
University of Coimbra, Portugal

Rita Justo Silva
Affiliation University of Coimbra
Country Portugal
Scopus ID 57211688746
Documents 3
Citations 201
h-index 3
Subject Area Transportation Systems
Event International Research Excellence And Citation Awards

Rita Justo Silva is a researcher affiliated with the University of Coimbra in Portugal whose stated subject area is Transportation Systems. The researcher record supplied for this academic recognition profile includes a Scopus author identifier of 57211688746, three indexed documents, 201 citations, and an h-index of 3. These bibliometric indicators provide a quantitative snapshot of the research record represented in the supplied profile.

Abstract

This academic recognition profile presents the research record of Rita Justo Silva, University of Coimbra, Portugal, in the field of Transportation Systems. The supplied bibliometric information identifies three documents, 201 citations, and an h-index of 3 associated with the stated Scopus author profile. The profile is considered in relation to the Innovative Research Award within the International Research Excellence And Citation Awards. Bibliometric measures are descriptive indicators and should be interpreted alongside the substance, originality, relevance, and documented contribution of individual research outputs. [1]

Keywords

Rita Justo Silva; University of Coimbra; Portugal; Transportation Systems; transportation research; mobility systems; transport analysis; innovative research; research impact; bibliometrics; citation analysis; academic recognition.

Introduction

Transportation systems research encompasses the study, planning, analysis, operation, and improvement of systems that enable the movement of people and goods. Research in this area may draw upon engineering, data analysis, operations research, urban planning, economics, and related disciplines. The field increasingly uses quantitative approaches to examine system performance, connectivity, accessibility, efficiency, safety, and sustainability.

Within this context, the supplied academic record places Rita Justo Silva at the University of Coimbra and associates the researcher with Transportation Systems. The available profile information indicates an academic record that can be examined through both publication-level evidence and bibliometric indicators. Citation counts and h-index values can assist in describing scholarly visibility, although such measures do not independently establish the quality or originality of a research contribution. [2]

Research Profile

Rita Justo Silva is identified in the supplied information as a researcher at the University of Coimbra, Portugal, with Transportation Systems listed as the principal subject area. The associated Scopus identifier is 57211688746. The supplied record reports three documents and 201 citations, resulting in an h-index of 3. These values describe the bibliometric profile provided for this article and may change as databases are updated or records are corrected.

Research Contributions

The supplied record identifies Transportation Systems as the relevant research domain. Within such a broad field, scholarly contributions may address the design and evaluation of transport networks, mobility patterns, system optimization, infrastructure planning, travel behavior, or related analytical problems. Because detailed publication titles, abstracts, and research findings were not supplied for this profile, specific technical contributions are not attributed here beyond the documented subject classification.

The reported citation count provides evidence that the indexed documents have received scholarly citations, while the h-index represents a particular bibliometric measure of citation distribution. Such indicators are best considered together with publication content, methodological contribution, research context, and independent evidence of practical or scientific use. [3]

Publications

The supplied profile records three documents associated with the Scopus author identifier 57211688746. Individual publication titles, journals, publication dates, author lists, and DOI identifiers were not provided in the source information accompanying this article. Consequently, no specific publication-level claims or DOI assignments are made here without verification against the corresponding bibliographic records.

For an academic recognition profile, publication assessment may consider the relevance of the work to Transportation Systems, methodological rigor, originality, peer-reviewed dissemination, citation context, and demonstrated contribution to subsequent scholarship. Bibliographic databases should be consulted directly for current publication metadata. [1]

Research Impact

The supplied bibliometric record reports 201 citations across three documents and an h-index of 3. These figures indicate measurable citation activity within the indexed record. Citation metrics can provide one dimension of research visibility, but their interpretation depends on field, publication age, database coverage, collaboration patterns, and the distribution of citations across individual works. [2]

For Transportation Systems research, broader impact can also include contributions to planning methods, transport operations, infrastructure decisions, mobility analysis, policy-relevant evidence, software or analytical methods, and subsequent research. The available information does not provide sufficient evidence to attribute particular societal or operational outcomes to Rita Justo Silva, so such outcomes are not asserted in this profile.

Award Suitability

The Innovative Research Award is presented in this profile as the recognition category associated with Rita Justo Silva at the International Research Excellence And Citation Awards. The documented information establishes an affiliation with the University of Coimbra, a Transportation Systems subject area, and the supplied bibliometric indicators of three documents, 201 citations, and an h-index of 3.

A complete award assessment may additionally consider the originality of the research, significance of the research problem, methodological rigor, publication quality, reproducibility, interdisciplinary relevance, documented applications, and evidence of influence. The available profile data alone should therefore be understood as supporting information rather than as a complete assessment of research quality or innovation.

  • Documented affiliation: University of Coimbra, Portugal.
  • Documented research area: Transportation Systems.
  • Supplied Scopus author identifier: 57211688746.
  • Supplied bibliometric record: 3 documents, 201 citations, and h-index 3.
  • Award category specified in the supplied information: Innovative Research Award.

Conclusion

Rita Justo Silva is identified in the supplied academic information as a University of Coimbra researcher working in Transportation Systems. The associated profile reports three documents, 201 citations, and an h-index of 3. These indicators provide a concise bibliometric description of the supplied record. Further evaluation of research innovation and academic contribution would require examination of the underlying publications, research methods, findings, citation context, and documented applications. [1]

References

  1. Elsevier. (n.d.). Scopus author details: Rita Justo Silva, Author ID 57211688746. Scopus.https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=57211688746
  2. Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569–16572.https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102
  3. Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H.-D. (2008). What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior. Journal of Documentation, 64(1), 45–80.https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410810844150