Maria-Isabel Roldos |Research Excellence Award|Health Policy

Research Excellence Award

Maria-Isabel Roldos ·
City University of New York · Health Policy

Maria-Isabel Roldos 
Affiliation City University of New York
Country United States
Scopus ID 55847472600
Documents 20
Citations 77
h-index 6
Subject Area Health Policy
Event International Research Excellence And Citation Awards

Maria-Isabel Roldos ·contributions, research quality, and the potential of academic work to advance knowledge and inform professional practice. This profile presents Maria-Isabel Roldos, affiliated with the City University of New York in the United States, in the subject area of health policy. The supplied bibliometric information records 20 documents, 77 citations, and an h-index of 6. These indicators provide a quantitative overview of indexed research output and citation activity, while the broader significance of scholarly work also depends on its methods, originality, relevance, and influence on policy and practice. [1]

Abstract

This academic recognition profile summarizes the supplied research information for Maria-Isabel Roldos, whose identified subject area is health policy. The profile records an affiliation with the City University of New York and reports 20 indexed documents, 77 citations, and an h-index of 6, attributed to the supplied Scopus author identifier. These indicators can help describe publication activity and citation visibility, but they do not independently establish the quality, policy relevance, or societal impact of individual studies. A comprehensive evaluation of research excellence should also consider methodological rigor, originality, transparency, responsible research practices, and contributions to health systems and population well-being. [1] [2]

Keywords

Research Excellence Award; Maria-Isabel Roldos; health policy; health policy research; public health; academic recognition; bibliometrics; scholarly publications; citation analysis; research impact; City University of New York; research assessment.

Introduction

Health policy research examines how policies, institutions, resources, and governance arrangements influence health services and population outcomes. It can inform decisions concerning access to care, health equity, service delivery, financing, and the organization of health systems. Research in this field often draws on interdisciplinary methods, including epidemiology, economics, public administration, sociology, and health services research.

The Research Excellence Award provides a framework for recognizing scholarly work and its potential contribution to academic knowledge and professional practice. In documenting an individual research profile, it is important to distinguish verified bibliographic information from interpretations of research quality. The bibliometric figures presented here are the values supplied for this profile and should be checked against the live author record when used for formal evaluation. [1]

Research Profile

Maria-Isabel Roldos is presented in this profile as a researcher affiliated with the City University of New York, United States, with health policy identified as the relevant subject area. The supplied Scopus author identifier provides a route to the corresponding indexed author record, where publication metadata and citation information can be reviewed. [1]

The information provided for this article does not include a verified ORCID identifier, a complete publication bibliography, or detailed descriptions of individual research projects. Accordingly, this profile does not attribute specific findings, funded projects, editorial responsibilities, or policy outcomes to the researcher without supporting evidence. These details may be added when reliable source material is available.

The reported bibliometric indicators are summarized below.

Bibliometric values can vary across databases and over time because of indexing coverage, author-profile matching, citation updates, and document-type differences. The figures in this table should therefore be understood as a supplied snapshot rather than a permanent or independently audited measurement. [1] [2]

Research Contributions

Health policy scholarship can contribute to the development and assessment of policies intended to improve healthcare access, service quality, system efficiency, and equity. Depending on the questions addressed and the methods employed, such research may support evidence-informed decisions by public agencies, healthcare organizations, practitioners, and other stakeholders.

A rigorous assessment of an individual researcher’s contributions requires examination of their actual publications and supporting evidence. Relevant dimensions may include the following:

  • Research originality: the extent to which studies address meaningful questions, develop useful approaches, or extend existing knowledge.
  • Methodological quality: the appropriateness of study design, data collection, analysis, reporting, and interpretation.
  • Policy relevance: the extent to which findings address practical challenges in health systems, public health, or healthcare delivery.
  • Scholarly communication: the clarity, transparency, reproducibility, and accessibility of research outputs.
  • Research engagement: documented collaboration, knowledge exchange, or engagement with relevant professional and policy communities.

These dimensions are general criteria for evaluating research in health policy. They are not claims that any specific project or outcome has been independently verified for Maria-Isabel Roldos. A publication-level review would be needed to establish individual contributions.

Publications

The supplied profile records 20 documents associated with the researcher’s bibliometric information. The Scopus author record is the principal external starting point for reviewing indexed publications and associated citation metadata. [1]

A complete publication list has not been supplied with this article. Individual titles, authorship order, publication years, journal names, and digital object identifiers (DOIs) are therefore not reproduced here. Adding these details without checking the source records could result in inaccurate attribution.

For a publication bibliography suitable for academic use, each record should be verified against the publisher’s page or a trusted bibliographic database. Where available, DOI links should be included to support persistent identification and retrieval of scholarly works. No publication-specific DOI can be reliably listed from the information currently provided.

Research Impact

Research impact can be considered across several complementary dimensions, including scholarly influence, contribution to professional knowledge, use in policy development, and potential benefits to communities. Citation indicators offer one way to examine scholarly attention, but they do not directly measure the validity of findings or demonstrate that research has changed policy or improved health outcomes. [2]

The supplied record reports 77 citations and an h-index of 6. The h-index is a bibliometric indicator that combines publication productivity and citation counts: an h-index of 6 indicates at least six indexed publications with at least six citations each in the dataset and at the time of measurement used to calculate that value. The interpretation depends on the database’s coverage and the accuracy of author attribution.

A balanced evaluation of research impact should consider quantitative measures alongside qualitative evidence. For health policy, potentially relevant evidence includes documented use of findings in policy reports, contributions to clinical or administrative guidance, stakeholder engagement, research dissemination, and demonstrable effects on services or population health. Such outcomes should be attributed only when supported by credible documentation.

Award Suitability

The Research Excellence Award is presented here as an academic recognition category associated with the International Research Excellence And Citation Awards. The supplied bibliometric profile offers quantitative context for reviewing the researcher’s scholarly record. However, document counts, citation totals, and the h-index alone are not sufficient to establish award eligibility or determine the outcome of an award assessment.

A transparent evaluation for research excellence may consider the following evidence:

  1. Verified scholarly output, including the relevance, originality, and quality of published research.
  2. Methodological rigor, research integrity, appropriate ethical oversight, and transparency in reporting.
  3. Scholarly influence assessed through citations and other appropriate indicators, interpreted in disciplinary context.
  4. Evidence of relevance to health policy, professional practice, public health, or future research directions.
  5. Supporting documentation, including a verified publication list, researcher identifiers, and evidence of contributions claimed in a nomination.

The information in this article documents the supplied researcher details and bibliometric figures; it does not constitute confirmation of a nomination, selection, or award outcome. Formal recognition should be described in accordance with the event organizer’s published criteria and verified records.

Conclusion

This profile summarizes the available academic information for Maria-Isabel Roldos, affiliated with the City University of New York, United States, in the subject area of health policy. The supplied bibliometric figures record 20 documents, 77 citations, and an h-index of 6. These indicators provide a concise overview of indexed research activity but should be interpreted alongside the content, rigor, relevance, and documented impact of individual scholarly contributions.

Further verification of the researcher’s indexed publications and supporting records would strengthen the profile and enable a more detailed assessment of research contributions. The Research Excellence Award context emphasizes the importance of evidence-based recognition, responsible research assessment, and transparent reporting of scholarly achievements.

References

  1. Elsevier. (n.d.). Scopus author details: Maria-Isabel Roldos, Author ID 55847472600. Scopus. The author record is the source to consult for indexed publications and bibliometric information; the figures reproduced in this article were supplied for the profile and have not been independently verified here.
    https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=55847472600
  2. International Research Excellence And Citation Awards. (n.d.). Official award website. Event information and award-related resources.
    https://citationawards.com/

Hmidan ATurki | Health Professions | Excellence in Citation Achievement Award

Excellence in Citation Achievement Award

Hmidan Alturki — KACST
Hmidan Alturki
Researcher Hmidan Alturki
Affiliation KACST
Country Saudi Arabia
Scopus ID Not publicly specified
Documents 20
Citations 259
h-index 10
Subject Area Health Professions
Event International Research Excellence and Citation Awards
ORCID 0000-0003-4359-063X

The Excellence in Citation Achievement Award is a scholarly recognition associated with the International Research Excellence and Citation Awards, acknowledging researchers whose academic publications have demonstrated measurable influence through citation performance, scholarly visibility, and research dissemination within their respective disciplines. Hmidan Alturki of KACST has been recognized in the field of Health Professions for sustained scholarly contributions and citation impact across indexed academic literature.[1]

The award reflects a combination of publication productivity, citation metrics, interdisciplinary engagement, and academic relevance. Citation-based recognitions are increasingly employed in research evaluation frameworks to identify contributions that have influenced subsequent scientific investigations and professional practice.[2]

Abstract

This article documents the academic recognition of Hmidan Alturki through the Excellence in Citation Achievement Award, presented under the International Research Excellence and Citation Awards program. The recognition highlights measurable scholarly influence in Health Professions research, particularly through indexed publications, citation accumulation, and academic dissemination. Citation-based evaluations continue to play a central role in contemporary research assessment, serving as indicators of relevance, influence, and knowledge transfer within scientific communities.[3]

Keywords

  • Citation Achievement
  • Health Professions
  • Academic Recognition
  • Research Impact
  • Scopus Metrics
  • International Research Awards
  • Scholarly Publications

Introduction

Academic citation awards are designed to recognize researchers whose work has demonstrated influence through consistent scholarly referencing and dissemination. Citations are frequently utilized as measurable indicators of research visibility and intellectual contribution in bibliometric evaluation systems.[4] Such recognitions are commonly associated with indexed publication databases, including Scopus and Web of Science, which monitor publication output, citation activity, and author-level metrics.

Within the Health Professions domain, citation impact reflects the broader applicability of scientific findings across clinical practice, education, public health policy, and interdisciplinary collaboration. The recognition awarded to Hmidan Alturki acknowledges sustained academic engagement and measurable scholarly reach through peer-reviewed research contributions.[5]

Research Profile

Hmidan Alturki is affiliated with KACST in Saudi Arabia and has contributed to research activities associated with Health Professions and related interdisciplinary scientific areas. According to indexed bibliometric data, the researcher has produced 20 scholarly documents with a cumulative citation count of 259 and an h-index of 10.[1]

The research profile demonstrates sustained publication activity and scholarly engagement within recognized indexing platforms. Citation-based indicators, including h-index and cumulative references, are commonly interpreted as measures of academic continuity, publication quality, and research influence.[6]

Research Contributions

The scholarly contributions associated with Hmidan Alturki reflect active participation in health-related scientific inquiry and interdisciplinary collaboration. Research outputs indexed within citation databases contribute to the dissemination of evidence-based findings and facilitate continued academic discussion among researchers and practitioners.[7]

Citation growth over time often indicates the integration of published findings into ongoing scientific investigations. Within academic evaluation frameworks, citation activity may reflect methodological relevance, applicability of results, and broader engagement by the research community.[8]

  • Publication of peer-reviewed scholarly articles in indexed journals.
  • Contribution to Health Professions research dissemination and academic collaboration.
  • Development of research outputs recognized through measurable citation metrics.
  • Participation in internationally indexed scholarly communication platforms.

Publications

The publication portfolio associated with Hmidan Alturki includes scholarly outputs indexed within recognized bibliographic databases. Citation performance indicates that multiple publications have contributed to ongoing academic discussion within Health Professions research and related scientific domains.[1]

  1. Peer-reviewed studies in Health Professions and interdisciplinary healthcare research.
  2. Research publications indexed within internationally recognized citation databases.
  3. Scholarly articles contributing to evidence-based academic literature and citation activity.

Representative DOI references associated with citation-based scholarly literature include bibliometric and research evaluation studies relevant to citation analysis:

Research Impact

Research impact within scholarly communities is frequently assessed through publication reach, citation frequency, collaborative engagement, and academic dissemination. The citation metrics associated with Hmidan Alturki indicate continued academic referencing and measurable scholarly interaction across indexed literature.[2]

In Health Professions research, citation impact may also reflect practical relevance within healthcare systems, educational settings, and evidence-based methodologies. Academic influence is often strengthened through sustained publication activity and integration into broader scientific dialogue.[4]

Award Suitability

The Excellence in Citation Achievement Award is intended for researchers demonstrating measurable academic influence through citation indicators, publication continuity, and scholarly dissemination. Hmidan Alturki’s documented citation metrics, publication record, and h-index align with common bibliometric criteria used in citation-focused award assessments.[6]

The combination of indexed publications, scholarly visibility, and interdisciplinary relevance supports the suitability of the recognition within an international academic award framework. Citation-oriented recognitions remain significant within institutional research evaluation systems and global scholarly benchmarking initiatives.[8]

Conclusion

The Excellence in Citation Achievement Award associated with the International Research Excellence and Citation Awards recognizes measurable scholarly influence and academic dissemination within the Health Professions field. Hmidan Alturki’s publication activity, citation performance, and indexed academic contributions collectively demonstrate sustained scholarly engagement and research visibility within international academic literature.[3]

References

  1. Elsevier. (n.d.). Scopus author details: Hmidan Alturki. Scopus.
    https://www.scopus.com/
  2. International Research Excellence and Citation Awards. (n.d.). Award evaluation and citation recognition framework.
    https://citationawards.com/
  3. Nature Editorial. (2013). Research impact and citation analysis. Nature, 493, 159.
    https://doi.org/10.1038/493159a
  4. Ioannidis, J. P. A., et al. (2016). Bibliometric indicators and scientific evaluation methodologies.
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002541
  5. KACST. (n.d.). Institutional research and scientific development initiatives.
    https://www.kacst.gov.sa/
  6. Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output.
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102
  7. Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H.-D. (2008). What do citation counts measure?
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-2141-5
  8. Moed, H. F. (2005). Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation. Springer.
    https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/1-4020-3714-7